馃敟 Prime Day 2026 Deals Start In 馃敟
Loading...
June 23–26, 2026

Thursday, December 28, 2017

5 Day Fast

The 8th, 9th and the 10th of Teves = 3 days fast.

When do we have a 5* days fast?

*讛诇讻讛 诪驻讜专砖转 讘砖讜"

FOR ANSWER CLICK HERE

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

                           THE GREAT WONDER- NO WONDER


The Mechaber in Shulchan Aruch (O. Ch. 580) lists additional fast days.

One of the fast days is on the 9th day in Teves. “It is unknown what
Tzoroh happened on that day”.

The 讟"讝 writes" 转讬诪讛 讙讚讜诇讛  (It's a great wonder) that the Bais Yosef
doesn't know what happened that day. In our Selichos (Ezkero Motzok)
it is written that Ezra Hasofer died on the 9th of the month".

It is interesting, this Piyut is said, only by Ashkenazim. The Sefardim
say the Piyut “Sha’a Elyon” and the Piyut “Yoshev Bashomayim”.
In both of these Piyutim, it is mentioned that Ezra Hasofer died on the
10th of Teves.

The Mechaber, being  Sefardi didn't say the Piyut Ezkero Motzok.
He said instead the other two Piyutim that states Ezra was niftar 
on the 10th and therefore there shouldn't be a wonder why he 
didn’t know what happened on the 9th of Teves. 讗诪讘爪讬
Ashkenaz




Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Don't Be A Golem

            Don't be a Golem


Academics & scholars, frum or non-frum, Jews or non-Jews, consider The famous story of the 
Golem of Prague as fictitious. There is no evidence of the Maharal ever creating a Golem.

Probably the first mention of the Golem of Prague goes back to the year 1837. A Maskil by the name of Berthold Auerbach wrote a novel on Spinoza. In the fictional details of the Cherem, Spinoza declared not to  believe in the Golem of Prague was put in Cherem. Auerbach is trying to ridicule the Frum Yidden and their Cherem. For not believing in fairy tales they are put in Cherem.

These few lines in the novel are the first and only mention of the Golem. This part in the novel might have created the legend of the Maharal creating a Golem.

R. Yidel Rosenberg z"l who was a Rav in Lodz & Warsaw immigrated to Canada. He became a Rav in 
Toronto & later in Montreal. He claimed to have acquired from The (non-existent) Royal Library in Metz, 
manuscripts of R. Yitzchok Katz zt"l son in law of the Maharal.  One of them was the manuscript describing 
in detail the creation of the Golem. 

In the year 1908/9, Reb Yidel Rosenberg printed this manuscript and called it "Niflaos Maharal".

It was R.Y.Rosenberg's "Niflaos Maharal" which popularized the Golem story amongst the Yidden 
& eventually even amongst the Non-Jews.

Within the first year, after it was published, R, Mendel Eckstein z"l,  published a Sefer and called it Sefer Yetzira. 

He refuted the Sefer Niflaos Maharal and claimed it to be a fraud. He also claimed that some parts of the story 
would be even Halachically incorrect.

One of his proofs is (among many)  Ri Katz writes about a Talmid of the "Tosfos Yom Tov". In his days there was no such Sefer printed yet. R. Yom Tov Lipman Heller Wallerstein was not known as the Tosfos Yom Tov. Ri Katz could not have called him "The Tosfos Y.T."

Since then many more such proofs were found that the Sefer is a total fraud. One of the proofs is,  
he mentions the word "砖注讜谉"  (watch)  This word was invented a few hundred years later by Ben Yehuda.

In Seforim of that time or the ones printed within hundred years later none of them ever mention The Golem 
of Prague.

The Chacham Zvi who lived a hundred years after the Maharal mentions of a Golem created in Chelm a few 
hundred years before the Maharal. The Chida too speaks about the Golem in Chelm. They were both not 
aware of the Golem of Prague.

In Chabad, on the other hand, they do believe in the story of the Golem of Prague. The Rebbe zt"l writes,
his father in law (诪讛专讬讬"爪) told him that he personally went up to the attic of the Altneu Shul and saw the 
remains of the Golem* there. 

Another reason from the Rebbe believing the story to be true is because even the Goyim knew about it and claim 
so to be true.


*The Sefer Niflaos Maharal (Y. Rosenberg) writes,"The Maharal placed the decommissioned Golem in the attic of the Altneu Shul."


We want Moshiach now.

                     We want Moshiach now.

In Nusach Sfard Siddurim at the end of the Bracha of 讗转 爪诪讞 讚讜讚 it says 讜诪爪驻讬诐 诇讬砖讜注讛.

The words "讜诪爪驻讬诐 诇讬砖讜注讛" do not belong there.

It has never been part of any Nusach of the 砖诪讜谞讛 注砖专讛.

Originally someone wrote it on the side of the Bracha as instruction and advice to have  there in mind to expect the 讬砖讜注讛 of 讘讬讗转 讛诪砖讬讞.

The Gemoro (Shabbos 31a) says one of the first questions one will be asked will 
be "?爪讬驻讬转 诇讬砖讜注讛"  (Did you expect 诪砖讬讞)

The person who wrote 讜诪爪驻讬诐 诇讬砖讜注讛 felt it would be an appropriate place&time to have 
in mind, the coming of Moshiach during the Bracha of 讗转 爪诪讞 讚讜讚.

Some Poskim strongly oppose adding the words 讜诪爪驻讬诐 诇讬砖讜注讛  being it's not part of the Nusach of the Bracha.



TODAY IS A FAST DAY

                The fast day of  讞' 讟讘转

The  Shulchan Aruch (580:1) enumerates  21 additional
fast days (on top the 4 fasts, Ta'anis Esther & Yom Kippur)
One of them is.
"On the 8th day in Teves. {TODAY} The story 
of 转诇诪讬 讛诪诇讱 ( Septuagint) happened."

The 讟讜专 writes "讻转讘 讘讛"讙 讗诇讜 讛讬诪讬诐 砖诪转注谞讬谉 讘讛诐 诪谉 讛转讜专讛
(The 讘讛"讙 writes   “These fasts (the 21 additional fast days) 
are 诪谉 讛转讜专讛.)

The 讘"讞 & the 讘"讬  explain that the 讘讛"讙 meant when he
wrote that these fasts are 诪谉 讛转讜专讛, that they are
important fast days to be taken seriously as if it is 诪谉 讛转讜专讛


Monday, December 25, 2017

Who loves them the most?

Who loves them the most?

The Zohar (Parshas V’yechi) writes, " People love

their grandchildren more  than their own children."

Friday, December 22, 2017

APIKORES!!!!!!

                            NOT A WORD BUT A NAME

According to the Seder Hadoros:

 There was a person whose name was
"Apikores" and another person whose name was "Min"

Both of them were non-believers in the Torah.


Their followers were called Apikorsim & Minim

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Instant Pot Duo Mini 3 Qt 7-in-1 Multi- Use Programmable Pressure Cooker, Slow Cooker, Rice Cooker, Steamer, Saut茅, Yogurt Maker and Warmer

Only $47.99 today ! 



CLICK HERE TO SEE DEAL

  • Instant Pot Duo Mini, the ideal companion to the Instant Pot Duo, the number # 1 selling multi-cooker, combines 7 kitchen appliances in 1, Rice Cooker, Pressure Cooker, Slow Cooker, Steamer, Saut茅, Yogurt Maker and Warmer.
  • Perfect for smaller families or to make a small dish for two, side dish or while traveling such as camping, traveling by RV, boating, sailing, hotel excursions Cooks up to 12 Cups of rice (Cooked), 6 Cups of rice (uncooked)
  • Features 11 Smart Programmable digital controls – Rice, Soup/Broth, Meat/Stew, Bean/Chili, Saut茅, Porridge, Steam, Slow Cook, Yogurt, Keep Warm, and Pressure Cook
  • Note: The Instant Pot Duo Mini max capacity is 6 cups uncooked rice (12 cups cooked), please use the rice measuring cup that comes with the Duo Mini.
  • Up to 24 hour delay start, automatic Keep Warm up to 10 hours, and sound ON/OFF..10 Safety Mechanisms - UL and ULC certified
  • Stainless steel (18/8) inner cooking pot, food grade 304, no chemical coating, 3-ply bottom dishwasher safe.
  • Accessories include: Rice measuring cup, stainless steel steam rack without handles, rice paddle, soup spoon, condensation collector and recipe booklet. To maximize performance of cooker only use genuine Instant Pot accessories.

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Holy Candles

 砖驻转 讗诪转 砖讘转 讻讘 讚"讛 讘讙诪'  讛"讙 砖诇讗  says that it is 砖诪讜讗诇 that asks and 专讘 holds they have 拽讚讜砖讛 as we say 讛谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜 拽讜讚砖 讛诐. see there that even 砖诪讜讗诇 may be referring to after the 讝诪谉 讛讚诇拽讛.
manoach 
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2 Answers.

1.  Of course the Neros are Kodesh.  However, the gemarah is asking in terms of Me'ila.  Would it be considered mei'la to count money and be nehene from the Neros, on that the Gemarah says there is no Hekdesh Kedusha in the Neros in terms of Meila.  But you cant do something that is a Bizuy specifically because the Neros DO have a certain level of Kedusha, kedushas Mitzvah.  If they didnt why cant you count money by them?

2.  The Mechaber* of Haneros Halalu is a different Man DiAmar than the Maskanas HaGimara.  According to the Gemarah one should be able to learn Torah by the Neros becuase that is not Biyzuy Mitzvah, only counting Money is and the like is asur.  But according to Haneros Halalu we cant use the candles for anything - ela liRosam bilvad!
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
It means set aside for the mitzvah and cannot be used for anything else. Like a lady who is 诪拽讜讚砖转 cannot marry  anyone else or when  you set aside a 拽专讘谉
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
there's two types of Kedusha like hekdesh and a lower level of hukzah Lemitzvos 
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Haneiros Halolu was written by someone who had a Chasidishe Neshama. The Gemara was written by a cold Litvak.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

讛专讗砖讜谞讬诐 诪讘讬谞讬诐 砖讬砖 讘讝讛 诪讞诇讜拽转 讛讙' 砖讬讟讜转 讘讙诪' 讜讻谞专讗讛 讘注诇 讛"谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜" 砖讛讜讗 *诪讛讙讗讜谞讬诐 驻住拽 讻专讘:


讘注诇 讛诪讗讜专: 
诇诪"讚 讗住讜专 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 砖诇 谞专 讞谞讜讻讛 讻诇 转砖诪讬砖 讘诪砖诪注 讗驻讬' 转砖诪讬砖 讚诪爪讜讛 讜转砖诪讬砖 拽讚讜砖讛 诪砖讜诐 讚拽住讘专 讻讬讜谉 砖讛诐 讝讻专 诇谞专讜转 讜诇砖诪谉 砖诇 讛讬讻诇 讗住讜专讜转 讛谉 讘讛谞讗讛 讻诇 注讬拽专 讗驻讬诇讜 诇拽专讜讗 讘住驻专 讜讗驻讬' 诇住注讜讚转 砖讘转 讜诇住注讜讚转 诪爪讜讛 讜诇诪"讚 讗住讜专 诇讛专爪讜转 诪注讜转 讻谞讙讚 谞专 砖诇 讞谞讜讻讛 讚讜拽讗 讛专爪讗转 诪注讜转 讜讻讬讜爪讗 讘讛 砖讛讬讗 转砖诪讬砖 专砖讜转 讜砖诇 讞讜诇 讜讻讚拽讗 驻讬专砖 讟注诪讬讛 诪砖讜诐 讘讝讜讬讬 诪爪讜讛 讗讘诇 转砖诪讬砖 诪爪讜讛 讜转砖诪讬砖 拽讚讜砖讛 诪讜转专 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 讜砖诪讜讗诇 讚诪转诪讛 注诇讛 讜讻讬 谞专 拽讚讜砖讛 讬砖 讘讜 诇讗 住"诇 讚讗讬转 讘讬讛 住专讱 拽讚讜砖讛 讜诇讗 诪砖讜诐 讗讬住讜专 讛谞讗讛 讘诪砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 讜诇讗 讛讜讛 讻讛"讙 讘讝讜讬讬 诪爪讜讛 诇讚注转讬讛 讜诇讗 诪讚诪讬 诇讬讛 诇讻住讜讬 讛讚诐 讘专讙诇 讻讚诪讚诪讬 诇讬讛 专讘 讬讜住祝 注讚 讚诪砖转诪砖 讘讙讜驻讜 砖诇 谞专 讻诪讜 砖诪讻住讛 讚诐 讘专讙诇 讜诪谞讗 诇谉 讚讗讬转 诇讬讛 诇砖诪讜讗诇 讛讻讬 诪讚讗讬驻诇讬讙讜 专讘 讜砖诪讜讗诇 讘诪讚诇讬拽讬谉 诪谞专 诇谞专 讚讗诇诪讗 诇讗 砖专讬 砖诪讜讗诇 讗诇讗 诪谞专 诇谞专 讜诪讚诪讜转讬讘 专讘 讗讜讬讗 诪诪注砖专 砖谞讬 砖诪注转 诪讬谞讬讛 讚诇讗 砖专讬 砖诪讜讗诇 诇讛砖转诪砖 讘讙讜祝 讛谞专 讘讚讘专 讛专砖讜转 讜诪住拽谞讗 讚砖诪注转讗 讚讞讬讬砖讬谞谉 讘谞"讞 诇讘讝讜讬讬 诪爪讜讛 讗驻讬诇讜 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 诇讚讘专 讛专砖讜转 讻讙讜谉 讛专爪讗转 诪注讜转 讗讘诇 拽讚讜砖讛 讗讬谉 讘讛 讜诪讜转专 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 转砖诪讬砖 砖诇 诪爪讜讛 讜诇注讜诇诐 爪专讬讱 砖转讛讗 谞专 讗讞专转 注诪讜 讘讘讬转 拽讘讜注 诇讻诇 转砖诪讬砖讬讜 讻讚专讘讗 讚讗诪专 专讘讗 讜爪专讬讱 谞专 讗讞专转 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 讜讗驻讬' 诪讗谉 讚讗诪专 诪讜转专 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 讻诇 转砖诪讬砖 砖讘注讜诇诐 讘讛讗 讚专讘讗 诪讜讚讛 砖爪专讬讱 谞专 讗讞专转 砖诇讗 讬讛讗 讛专讜讗讛 讗讜诪专 诇爪专讻讜 讛讜讗 讚讗讚诇拽讛:

 诪诇讞诪讜转 讛砖诐:
讜讻诇 讛讙讗讜谞讬诐 讝"诇 讻讱 驻住拽讜 讛诇讻讛 讻专讘 诪转谞讗 讗诪专 专讘 

讙诐 注诇 讚专讱 讛讚专讜砖 讬砖 诪讛 诇讜诪专:

住驻专 砖驻转 讗诪转 - 讘专讗砖讬转 - 诇讞谞讜讻讛 - 砖谞转 [转专诇"讟]: 
讛谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜 拽讜讚砖 讛诐. 讜讘讙诪专讗 讗讬转讗 讜讻讬 谞专 拽讚讜砖讛 讬砖 讘讜. 谞专讗讛 讻讬 注讻砖讬讜 砖讗住专讜 诇讛砖转诪砖 诇讗讜专讛 讜讘谞"讬 诪拽爪讬谉 讛谞专讜转 诇砖诪讜 讬转' 讞诇 注诇讬讜 讛拽讚讜砖讛 讻讬 讘讗诪转 讘讻诇 诪爪讜讛 讬砖 拽讚讜砖讛 专拽 砖讛讜讗 诪讜住转专 讜讻驻讬 讗诪讜谞转 讛讗讚诐 讜诪讘讚讬诇 讛讙砖诪讬讜转 诪谉 讛诪爪讜讛. 诪转注讜专专 讛拽讚讜砖讛 讻谞"诇. [讜讝讛 讬砖 诇讻讜讬谉 讘诇砖讜谉 讛诪讚专砖 转谞讞讜诪讗 讜驻住讬拽转讗 讚讞谞讜讻讛 讗住讜专 诇讛砖转诪砖 讻讜' 诇讗 讬讗诪专 讗讚诐 讗讬谞讬 诪拽讬讬诐 诪爪讜转 讝拽谞讬诐 讻讜' 讙讜讝专讬谉 注诇讬 讜讗谞讬 诪拽讬讬诐 讻讜' 注"砖 驻' 谞砖讗. 讜讛讬讬谞讜 砖注"讬 砖谞讛讙讜 诇讛拽爪讜转讜 诇诪爪讜转讜 谞注砖讛 讘讗诪转 拽讜讚砖 讻谞"诇]:



* 诪住' 住讜驻专讬诐 驻"

I need help with a teretz

讜讻讬 谞专 拽讚讜砖讛 讬砖 讘讛? (砖讘转 讻"讘 注"讗)


The Gemoro says:

 "one may not count money in front of Chanukah candles"

The Gemoro asks why not 讜讻讬 谞专 拽讚讜砖讛 讬砖 讘讛? 

The Gemoro answers that the reason is not because of  Kedusha but because of 砖诇讗 讬讛讜 诪爪讜讜转 讘讝讜讬讜转.

The Gemoro seems to agree there is no such thing as holy Chanukah candles.

How can we say 讛谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜 拽讚砖 讛诐 ? 

I need the help from the Oilam for an answer.

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

诪砖讜讙注讬诐

诇讝"谞 讗讘讬 诪讜专讬 专' 爪讘讬 讬讛讜讚讛 讘谉 专' 诪砖讛 讝诇诇讛"讛
讬讜诐 讛砖谞讛 讗' 讚专"讞 讟讘转 (诇' 讻住诇讬讜)

      砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐


Most of the Oilam answered that 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐
applies to  Goyishe names. The only time there
is a problem is when changing to a Goyishe name.

I would like to take a different approach.

Perhaps the concept of 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐 only applies
to not changing an existing  name of a person.

The Loshon 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐 suggests not
changing an existing name and not that you shouldn't
name a child a Goyishe name. Possibly, in Mitzrayim
even changing to a new Jewish name should not
be done* 

Perhaps, to, name a newborn child who never
had a name with a made up name and  even
a non-Jewish name, the rule of 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐 won't
apply.**
If however a child was named at his Bris etc. and
later on decides to change his original name with a new
name for the sole purpose to blend in with the Goyim,
this would be wrong and this is what the Bnei Yisroel
were careful not to do. 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜

This might explain the Gemoro in Gittin 11b that says
 诪驻谞讬 砖专讜讘 讬砖专讗诇 砖讘讞讜抓 诇讗专抓 砖诪讜转讬讛谉 讻砖诪讜转 注讻讜"诐
and explain why throughout the ages Ashkenazim
have names in Yiddish, Polish, Russian and Sephardim
have names in Spanish & Ladino etc.

Harav R. Chaim Kanievsky Shlita is very Makpid not
to name with newly invented modern Hebrew names. He
claims that it's not a name at all and one must change
it to a proper Jewish name.

R. Chaim considers only names that appear in 转谞"讱 or
in 讘讬转 砖诪讜讗诇 (E.H. Hl. Gittin) or established names from
previous generations, as proper Jewish names.

His Psak is based on a Midrash Rabah (Breishis 37:7)
"The Rishonim who knew their Yichus and had Ruach
Hakodesh they were allowed to name after events
that occurred. We who are not at that level and may only
name names of our forefathers."

When asked why modern Hebrew names are different
than the names in Yiddish etc. that were given back in
Europe. R Chaim insists that they must have had their
own reasons and it is not applicable to modern Hebrew
names of today.

R. Chaim has a very strong opinion on the matter. He
refers to those who name their children with modern
Hebrew names as 诪砖讜讙注讬诐. He insists that they change
their names to a traditional name.

Mori V'Rabi Harav Hagaon R. Shlomo Miller Shlita is not
supportive of changing the name, being it might create
problems in the Kesubah and if Chas Vesholom there
will be a Get.


*One of the Meforshim on the Midrash (砖讛"砖 驻"讚) writes
"Being there are 专诪讝讬诐 of the 讙讗讜诇讛 in the  names of
the 砖讘讟讬诐, therefore, they were Zoche to go out of Mitzrayim
by not changing their names(seems even changing to a
Loshon Hakodesh name would have been problematic)

** There is no problem with  砖讬谞讜 讗转 砖诪诐 but you still may
not make up new names because of the Breishis Rabah 37:7

COVFEE OR WHISKEY

 诇讝讻讜转 谞砖诪转 讗讘讬 诪讜专讬 *专' 爪讘讬 讬讛讜讚讛 (讛讗砖讬) 讘谉 专' 诪砖讛 注"讛. 谞驻讟专 讗' 讚专"讞 讟讘转 (诇' 讻住诇讬讜) 讛'转砖住"讜



Halachos on Kiddush- heard from Moreinu V.Rabeinu 
Harav Hagaon R.Shlomo Miller Shlita
by Harav Hagaon R. Yehudah Gestetner** Shlita
** Mechaber Sefer 砖讘转 砖诇诪讛

It's best to make Kiddush on wine, grape juice, beer or
a full 专讘讬注讬转 of whiskey.
If the above is not available, it's better to make Kiddush 
on a full cup of coffee than on a small whiskey glass.

When making Kiddush on coffee:

1) It's preferable to use a quality coffee (Starbucks etc.)
The better the quality the more it is qualified as 讞诪专 诪讚讬谞讛

2) The coffee should be filled to the top of the cup.

3) Hot coffee should not be completely cooled off.

4) The coffee should not be too hot as you are meant to
drink a 诪诇讗 诇讜讙诪讬讜 (between 2-3 oz. depending on the 
size of individuals mouth) in one gulp.

5) B'dieved even if you sip the coffee and finish the

Shiur within 5 minutes, you are Yotzei.

How Do We Explain

Parshas Hashavua 讜讬讙砖

Of the 70 讬讜专讚讬 诪爪专讬诐 there are 69 different names (2x 讞爪专讜谉)
Chazal tell us 砖诇讗 砖讬谞讜 砖诪诐 that in Mitzrayim they didn't change 
their names.

How do we explain the names of the 谞砖讬讗讬诐, 诪专讙诇讬诐, 注诪专诐,诪砖讛, 讗讛专谉 讜讘谞讬讜
and all the names that appear in the 转讜专讛 after 讬爪讬讗转 诪爪专讬诐? There is not 
a single person (as far as I know) carrying the name of one of the 69 
names mentioned in this week's Parsha. The only exception is 讬讙讗诇 讘谉 讬讜住祝 
who was one of the Meraglim from 砖讘讟 讬砖砖讻专. All others had brand new names

The Chanuka Story

Piyut I saw in the Sefer "讞讬讬诐 砖讬砖 讘讛"*  quoting R. Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld Zt"l in the name of the Chasam Sofer. 
This Piyut encapsulates the Chanukah story.

砖诪讜谞讗讬诐      诇讞诪讜       谞爪讞讜                 讬讜讜谞讬诐
讜砖讬诐           讻谞住讜        驻讬谞讜         诇讬        讛讬讻诇
讘讬讘讬诐         诪爪讗讜       讘拽专拽注             砖诪谉
转讜诐            诪爪讗        讘讟讘注转    讛谉       讙讚讜诇
讬讘转诐         讙诇讬转        讛住驻讬拽             砖诪讜谞讛
讻诪讬诐         诪谞讜         拽讘注讜       住诇讬讜     讘讗

'               专讜转          诇讙诪讜专              讛诇诇

Friday, December 15, 2017

Another No Such Mitzva

According to Harav Yosef Sholom Elyashiv zt"l: (Ashrei Ha'ish)

Lighting a Chanukah Menorah in front of the City Hall, Parliament
buildings, top of cars or other public places etc. makes no sense 
whatsoever, even if your intention is to publicize the Neis 
of Chanukah.

Chazal instituted 驻讬专住讜诪讬 谞讬住讗,  when, where, and how.

Anywhere else, there is absolutely no Mitzvah to do. 


Those who light there with a 讘专讻讛 are 注讜讘专 on a 讘专讻讛 诇讘讟诇讛"

There is no such Mitzvah

There is no such Mitzvah to light 
      Chanuka candles in Shul.

1) Lighting Chanukah candles in Shul is not mentioned in Bavli, Yerushalmi or Rambam. Even the Tur & Shulchan Aruch don't say there is Chiyuv to light in Shul. They do 
mention it indirectly. (where to place it and to light it before Havdalah)

2) The Minhag of lighting in Shul started in the times of the Gaonim. 

3) This Minhag is one of the few  Minhagim where we make a Bracha  "讗砖专 拽讚砖谞讜 讘诪爪讜转讬讜".

4) The Chasam Sofer writes (Shu”t  O. Ch,186) about all the large Shuls he has visited:

"Their Minhagim are based on the early Gaonim most of them lit the Menorah with wax candles". (not with oil)"

5) The Shamash from the Shul Menorah is considered a Ner Mitzvah and may not be used for personal benefit*.

*Mishna Veruro 674 sk 7 in the name of Maharshal

Thursday, December 14, 2017

No Strangers This Time

Shavuos 15a

诪讻讗谉 讜讗讬诇讱 注讘讜讚转谉 诪讞谞讻转谉
                    
The Rambam writes a   讝专 may light the Menorah in the Bais Hamikdash. In order for a 讝专 to light, it would require bringing out the Menora to where the 讝专 may stand. After the 讝专 lights it the Kohanim return the Menorah back to its place. 

This proves that at the Bais Hamikdash we don't Pasken.  注讜砖讛 诪爪讜讛讛讚诇拽讛 Otherwise it would be Pasul being it was lit in the wrong place.

If this is true then why for Chanukah do we  pasken   讛讚诇拽讛 注讜砖讛 诪爪讜讛 ?
Shouldn't it have the same Din as in the Bais Hamikdash?

The Rogatchover Gaon zt”l says:
 “in the times  of Bayis Sheini (no Shemen Hamishcha ) the way to be Mekadesh a new Kli Shoreis, was having a Kohen  use it
for the first time, during the Avodah.

During the Nes Chanukah  they lit with a new Menorah for the first time. To be Mekadesh  the new Menorah,required Kohanim to light the Menorah. “

Mori V’rabi Harav Hagaon Reb Shlomo Miller Shlita said:
with this Rogatchover we can understand why we pasken by Chanukah, 讛讚诇拽讛 注讜砖讛 诪爪讜讛 .

Chazal wanted to commemorate the Chinuch of the new Menorah , which required a Kohein to do the Hadlakah which was done inside.
Therefore we Paskin for Chanuka Licht 讛讚诇拽讛 注讜砖讛 诪爪讜讛


讗讞转 讜砖讘注          
讗谞讬 讛拽讟谉 讛讜住驻转讬 ,讜讘讝讛 诪讬讜砖讘 拽讜砖讬讬转 讛讘"讬
讘讬讜诐 讗' 讛转拽讬谞讜 诇讝讻专 讞谞讜讻转 讛诪谞讜专讛 
                                                                                                         ( 拽讬讚讜砖 讻诇讬 砖专转)         

讜注讜讚 讝' 讝讻专 谞住 驻讱 砖诪谉  

Calvin Klein Brodie Shoe JUST $56.67 AFTER %53 PRICE DROP

This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. At the time of posting the Calvin Klein Brod...