There is a Machlokes Tanaim if 讙讬讚 讛谞砖讛 is Muter or Asur 讘讛谞讗讛 (benefit)
Reb Yehuda holds that it is Muter and Reb Shimon* holds it
is Asur.
The Bais Yosef (Y.D. 65) holds that is best to refrain from having
Hanaha from the Gid Hanasha because The Zohar (Parshas Vayishlach) writes that it is Asur Behanaha.
The Rema in Darkei Moshe writes, he heard that the author
of the Zohar was R. Shimon (Bar Yochai) who is mentioned in the
Talmud.
If that is the case, why care that the Zohar holds that it is
Asur.
The Poskim rule, where there is a Machlokes between R. Shimon and
R. Yehuda the Halacha is like R. Yehuda.
It seems from the Bais Yosef that the Zohar was not written by
R. Shimon, otherwise How can you bring a proof that R.Shimon
in the Mishna Is right from the same R.Shimon (Zohar)
It is possible but unlikely**, to explain, the Bais Yosef means to
say, to be
Machmir because Al Pi Kabballah (Zohar) it is Assur not only
according
R.Shimon.
m*住转诐 专' 砖诪注讜谉 讛讜讗 专砖讘"讬
**诇讗 诪砖诪注 讻谉 讘讚专讻讬 诪砖讛
No comments:
Post a Comment
This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Note: We are not the seller of these products. Prices and details can change, and we may make mistakes — please double-check everything on the site before purchasing.
anything that is not relevant to the post will be marked as spam.